CMS

Views on the latest acquisition in the Web Content Management space

by: Chris Andrews on 03/02/2012

Monday 30th January 2012 and Alterian have officially become part of SDL. This is personally very exciting for me, not least as I am an Alterian alumnus like my good friend and ex-colleague SDL’s Ian Truscott, but more importantly, it raises the stakes to the tune of SDL’s just under £70 million cash investment in the grand game of trying to deliver on the long talked about Customer Experience Management (CXM).

SDL say: “This excellent strategic fit blends the marketing analytics, campaign management and social media capabilities from the Alterian product suite with that of SDL’s leading global Web and Structured Content Management, eCommerce and Language Management capabilities, providing an integrated platform for companies to significantly enhance the global customer experience.

Read more of what SDL say. 

Whilst I think the goal is both real and achievable, I’m sure there must be other motives under the surface of the rhetoric, some of which should give customers pause:

1. What (on the surface) does SDL add to the mix of technologies Alterian already possessed and had failed to capitalise on in terms of delivering the promise of CXM?

Alterian had a CMS and e-mail product with which to execute, albeit one less well regarded by the analyst community than SDL’s Tridion (I’ll come clean right here and say I really rate Tridion by the way).

Language then? Hmmm. SDL clearly believe they can execute where Alterian could not. I trust they plan to build a joined-up solution, the industry already suffers badly from a requirement to either mix and match across best-of-breed vendors in analytics and multi-variate testing, CMS, campaign management, translation, e-mail marketing, etc. or buy a vast and expensive toolset from a single vendor that is inevitably lacking in like-for-like features in at least some areas.

2. What does SDL really want from Alterian?

If SDL already have all the pieces of the puzzle except marketing analytics, campaign management and social media capabilities, then surely they could have picked up those they really need on the open market for less than £70 million? After all, Alterian picked up Techrigy in 2009 for significantly less. This is oversimplifying the financial reasoning I know, but casts some perspective on the numbers.

As the analysts caution each time there’s a major acquistion in the space, existing customers on the platfrom should be wary of deprecated product lines and potentially long pauses between releases whilst the acquiring company tries to digest its latest meal.

If I were a customer of Alterian’s CMS platfrom, I’d be very concerned about where my next upgrade was coming from for sure. I wonder if a good part of what SDL has actually bought is Alterian’s customers. We all know that’s how it really works, but we prefer not to talk about it because you can’t easily use the word “synergy”.

My esteemed ex-colleague Ian makes a passionate case for the advantages of the deal. Some of which I really buy, and some of which I question:

1. The combination of language and social – This one I think is a great call. Tridion makes a great job of conquering the challenges of language and content, so they bring unquestionable expertise to the next great frontier of content – social content.

2. Actionable insights – this one I just don’t quite buy yet. I’m sorry to say that people really have been spinning this line for quite a few years, and have been buying companies along the way with the express intention of the same. Customers have been stranded, product lines have been canned, people have lost their jobs, but I haven’t seen many actionable insights roll off the production lines of content management systems.  Throw European cookie legislation and the challenges of tracking individuals across devices into the mix and you wonder if it really can work the way we all hope. If I was SDL, I’d walk the walk first, then talk that talk.

3. Expertise not just technology – another good call, and something quite new and challenging from a vendor, I think Ian is actually maybe talking here about consultancy, professional services, something like that? Does SDL then have ambitions to become more like IBM? However, the risk I see here is to the partner/agency ecosystem with which the industry is largely peacefully co-existent. Vendors should compete with their own partners at their peril, and I’ve firsthand experience of that. 

Overall, one to watch for sure. My experience of SDL has been well above-average ability to execute, and I have to rate their chances of succeeding where Alterian failed as much better than even. If they do, then I’ve no doubt this will look like a very shrewd investment.

Even if we don’t see actionable insight nirvana in 2012, or even for longer, I still think that the combination of language and social that this acquisition represents could be remarkably powerful. Global brands should be paying close attention to SDL’s shiny new “social” muscles.


Tags:

Join the Discussion

Posts on our blog are currently reviewed for profanity and relevance before being published. We aim to review all comments within one hour and certainly within one working day at most.

Post a comment
User verification
Image for user verification
  1. Congratulations on your first industry blog post Chris. It’s good to see the Cookies blogging after all these years and I hope you don’t ‘crumble’ when others ‘Join in the Discussion’’- like some do ;) It would be good to get some perspectives on the digital world from your other knowledgeable peeps like Ted, Ben and Kashif if they’re still around.

    Anyway, many thanks for your insights into the SDL and Alterian moves. As you were closer to the Alterian operation than I and used Tridion extensively while at Reading Room, it is interesting to see you are drawing similar conclusions about the motivation for SDL’s acquisition, beyond all that wonderful talk of ‘synergies’. I very much agree that the SDL could have acquired the same, or better level of analytics, campaign management and social media monitoring capabilities for much less in today’s tough market and presumably ones that would be easier to integrate into a ‘best of breed’ multilingual solution. We both know that ACM’s multilingual handling is rudimentary compared to the likes of Tridion, EPiServer, Sitecore and others with multiple languages baked into their heritage and it struck me that with Alterian’s strongest focus being on the UK and US, it didn’t have globalisation requirements top of mind with the acquisition of Techrigy.

    With regards to your comment about me giving our esteemed ex-colleague Ian some hard knocks having worked in a similar position, I agree that trying to be a product and customer champion in organisations where ‘money talks’ and the profit imperative is high is not an easy role and it became even harder after acquisition as you know from taking it over. I acknowledged that quite clearly in my post about the SDL acquisition. Where Ian and I have been increasingly at odds in recent years is over the creation of meaningless acronyms and the rise of bullshit in the WCM space around terms such as ‘engagement’ and ‘experience’ - which you yourself have just called into question around the topic of ‘actionable insights’ and a challenge to SDL to ‘walk the walk’.

    Speaking as a lifelong marketer who has spent a lot of time at the sharp end of businesses buried in analytics and trying to gain ‘actionable insights’ I very much agree with what a whole bunch of veritable marketing folks have been saying about the ‘great engagement myth’ this week on the Marketing website. http://www.marketingmagazine.co.uk/news/1113464/great-brand-engagement-myth/ I know you had some trouble registering to read it so I have written a post titled ‘To engage or not to engage - that is the question:’ that highlights the main points and comments. http://2020visions.wordpress.com/2012/02/04/to-engage-or-not-to-engage-that-is-the-question/ Your challenge to SDL is to ‘walk the walk’. Likewise, I would ask people to follow the advice of that Marketing article... “Next time somebody speaks impressively about brand or customer engagement, ask yourself this: are they really communicating, or just bullsh**ting?”

  2. Thanks James, although you raised a groan with your 'crumble' pun ;o)

    You make some good points and thanks also for making easily available through your blog post the substance of the discussion around engagement that has caught your attention. I've been having some thoughts around this myself too, and wondering about where and how to publish them in full, but right now I guess my thinking looks like this:

    For me, the attitude and action of brands around "engagement" is a little one sided, and the other side of the coin might well have the word "intrusion" written on it. So I'm at least as interested in what it means to me as a person and consumer, as what it means to a brand and their quest for ROI. As a consumer, do I care at all about their marketing metrics? Working where I do, of course I am professionally very interested in ROI, and what can be achieved with CXM, but working especially where I do, I know that designing and building for the user is often the best way to achieve that.

    There are many circumstances when we might be more than happy to engage online - when it gets us a better deal, opens doors to more valuable content, helps us communicate with someone about a recent purchase, or even just makes that plain old association or affiliation between us as consumers and the brands we aspire to, own, or want to be identified with. But we're caught, we want brands to understand us, help us achieve the most with our cash, make us feel better about ourselves, make our lives like the pretty people in the TV ads - but we don't want them to stalk us, or have online tracking, behavioural targeting, or social media interactions put our security, privacy or reputation at risk.

    We want the web to be more free than the real world as a place to express ourselves in, but we don't want it to be unlawful or unsafe for our children. We want online shopping to be more convenient than real world shopping, and we want brands to listen to us (maybe), but we don't want a virtual sales-guy chasing us around the web-store hounding us with personalised offers.

    If Oliver Twist was holding out his bowl for some online engagement/privacy wouldn't he be asking "can I have it both ways please?"

    + The best deal, yes – but don't stalk me round your online store.

    + Catch terrorists, online fraudsters and child-molesters, yes – but let me keep my privacy.

    + Protect my income and stop people from breaching my intellectual property, yes – but don't stop me sharing.

    This is some distance from my initial post on an acquisition of a vendor by another vendor, but it does tie back to what was bought, and what was the goal of the deal. For me, I'm happy if CXM proceeds successfully, but with cautious footsteps, and if the needs, goals and informed consent of the users remain paramount in every online interaction designed for them. I do however remain convinced that in a globalised economy, a vendor with such great multi-lingual DNA (and people) is better placed than many to help brands do engagement right.

  3. I like the sound of this:Now SDL Trados Studio 2011 can connect to SDL WorldServer and SDL TMS™ tlansration memories for concordance searching for even greater productivity.Wonder what it will cost?Dennis

  4. God question, DennisI think SDL would awensr this question best. Try our SDL Nordic representive, Jane Chaffer ( )All the best,Katarina

About me

Chris Andrews

Chris specialises in selling and consulting on CMS systems, leading vendor selections, and providing pre-sales and technical consultancy. He joined Fortune Cookie in November 2010 from digital agency Reading Room following on from five years at CMS vendor Alterian where he had many roles including Vice President of WCM Product Management, CTO and Head of Pre-sales.

Since joining Fortune Cookie he has taken a leading role in technical sales for a number of clients including Canon, FIBA, Pinsent Masons, RHS, NetJets, NetJets Europe and American Express.

Chris enjoys running and ski-ing, the music of Take That and has a natty line in monogrammed shirts.

More about Chris.

Stop by for tea, tinnies, sok or coffee.

United States

275 Madison Avenue
14th Floor
New York, NY 10016
USA

Tel: +1 212 880 3785

Open America office details

Great Britain

The Lightwell

12-16 Laystall Street
Clerkenwell
London, EC1R 4PF

Tel: +44 (0)870 974 9791
Fax: +44 (0)870 736 5000

The Executive Centre

Towerpoint
44 North Road
Brighton
East Sussex
BN1 1YR

Tel: +44 (0) 8432 898 258

Open Great Britain office details

Polska

Silesia Office Center

ul. Katowicka 47
41-500 Chorzów
Polska

Tel: +48 32 743 91 42

Open Polska office details

Australia

Level 23, HWT Tower
40 City Road
Southbank
Melbourne
3006
Australia

Tel: +613 9674 7124

Level 6
69 Reservoir Street
Surry Hills
Sydney
NSW 2010

Tel: +612 8217 0703

Open Australia office details